We Have Ways of Making You Talk

In the wake of recent claims by a group of MPs suggesting that Britain may be utilizing intelligence obtained from tortured prisoners abroad, the documentary “We Have Ways Of Making You Talk” delves into the contentious history of torture as a tactic for interrogation. While the government vehemently denies any current involvement in torture, the film takes a bold step back in time, exploring the era when torture was considered a common and, according to former practitioners, highly effective method of extracting information.

The government’s firm stance against torture is stated as a matter of “fundamental principle,” but the allegations raise questions about the methods employed in the fight against terrorism. “We Have Ways Of Making You Talk” confronts this paradox by examining the historical context in which torture was once embraced as a routine means of interrogation.

The documentary sheds light on a dark period when torture was not only condoned but, according to some, celebrated for its efficacy. Former practitioners share their perspectives, providing chilling insights into the mindset that deemed such methods necessary. The film does not shy away from the uncomfortable reality that, at one point in history, torture was seen as a practical and efficient tool for gathering intelligence.

As the narrative unfolds, viewers are confronted with the ethical dilemmas surrounding the use of torture in the name of national security. The film does not aim to provide easy answers but rather prompts a critical examination of the fine line between safeguarding a nation and compromising its fundamental values.

The title, “We Have Ways Of Making You Talk,” itself, carries a weighty resonance, hinting at the coercive methods employed in the pursuit of information. The documentary navigates this morally fraught territory, challenging viewers to confront uncomfortable truths about the lengths societies have historically gone to extract information, even as the contemporary landscape grapples with the consequences of such actions.