David Shayler, a former MI5 officer turned 9/11 conspiracy theorist, teams with filmmaker Adrian Connock to put the BBC's own reporting on trial. Their target is a specific broadcast: the BBC Two strand The Conspiracy Files, and its February 18, 2007 episode on the September 11 attacks. The film goes through that program point by point, arguing it sidesteps forensic and scientific material questioning the official account, from structural claims about the World Trade Center collapse to witness testimony the BBC declined to air in full. Connock and Shayler frame this as more than one bad episode, presenting it as evidence of a broader pattern across mainstream British news coverage, where alternative theories are labeled conspiracy and dismissed rather than examined on the merits. The film builds its case through clips of the original broadcast set against the evidence it says was left out, asking why a public broadcaster would choose omission over rebuttal. It is a media-criticism piece as much as a 9/11 film, aimed squarely at how the BBC decided what its viewers would and would not hear.