Dishonorable Disclosures

“Dishonorable Disclosures” is a documentary that claims to shed light on the exploitation of Intelligence and Special Operations forces for political advantage by the Obama administration. The film features former operators who have agreed to go on record and share their frustrations about how their service has been used for political gain. However, upon closer examination, the film raises more questions than it answers.

One of the biggest issues with “Dishonorable Disclosures” is its lack of credibility. The film relies heavily on anonymous sources and unverifiable claims, making it difficult to discern what is fact and what is fiction. The use of anonymous sources is particularly troubling, as it undermines the film’s credibility and makes it difficult for viewers to verify the claims being made.

Furthermore, the film’s focus on blaming the Obama administration for all of the perceived breaches of security is overly simplistic and ignores the complex nature of national security. While it is certainly true that leaks and disclosures can put personnel and missions at risk, it is also important to recognize that there are often competing interests at play when it comes to national security. It is unfair to lay all of the blame for any perceived breaches of security solely at the feet of the Obama administration.

Another issue with “Dishonorable Disclosures” is its lack of context. The film presents a one-sided view of the situation, without providing any context or background information to help viewers understand the broader picture. For example, the film does not address the fact that leaks and disclosures have been an ongoing problem for decades, and that they are not unique to the Obama administration. By ignoring this context, the film fails to provide viewers with a complete understanding of the issue at hand.

Overall, “Dishonorable Disclosures” is a flawed documentary that raises more questions than it answers. While it is certainly true that breaches of security can put personnel and missions at risk, the film’s lack of credibility, simplistic focus on the Obama administration, and lack of context make it difficult to take its claims seriously.