Peter Joseph's 2007 internet release builds its argument in three parts, each aimed at a different pillar of modern belief. The first traces parallels between the Jesus story and older solar myths, arguing Christianity borrowed its central narrative from astrological archetypes. The second turns to September 11, laying out timeline discrepancies, structural collapse footage, and interviews used to question the official account of the attacks. The third follows the money, walking through the creation of the Federal Reserve and the mechanics of fractional reserve banking to argue that debt-based currency concentrates power in a small circle of financiers. Archival footage, newsreel clips, and text-based citations carry most of the argument, stitched together with a driving electronic score rather than a traditional narrator. The film became one of the most shared documentaries of its era, spawning sequels and years of rebuttal videos. Whether or not its conclusions hold up, it remains a snapshot of a particular strain of post-9/11 skepticism aimed at religion, government, and finance simultaneously.